CERIF
Task Group presentation,
18 june 02
Proposed agenda
|
|
CERIF
Task Group presentation, Proposed agenda |
| 1030-1045 |
Status on the work of the task group.What has
happened since the UK meeting? Action plan
and Task group report presented at the board meeting
march 02. Suggestion for further work: * Vocabulary, XML-exchange model, Namespace and Schema (Jens Vindvad) * Classification of disciplines (Beat Sottas) |
Andrei Lopatenko, University of Manchester
|
|
| 1045-1100 |
Why do we need euroCRIS and a CERIF model? Presentation based on the NoE project proposal to Cordis. |
Andrei Lopatenko/ Keith Jeffery | |
| 1100-1115 |
CERIF can be used on 3 levels : establishing
a CRIS, for exchange, as metadata. How can we see the model used? There is a need for guidelines and an easy introduction to CERIF especially in university contexts. |
Andrei Lopatenko/ Keith Jeffery/Beat Sottas | |
| 1115-1130 |
Break |
||
| 1130-1215
|
Migration of local databases to CERIF
format. Why go to the effort? |
Ales Bosjnak, Slovenia |
|
| 1215-1230
|
Proposed extension of the CERIF model and
establishing a test bed for new CERIF technologies. * Work done at RAL (Keith Jeffery) * other places? |
Andrei Lopatenko |
|
| 1230-1245 |
Establishing administrative procedures for formally adopting new versions of CERIF | Anne Asserson, UiB | |
| 31.05.2002 AA |